Visit our website
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
MIT Technology Review
MIT Technology Review
io9
io9
Techdirt
Techdirt
Knowledge@Wharton
Knowledge@Wharton
Bioscience Technology
Bioscience Technology
redOrbit
redOrbit
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Popular Science Blog
Popular Science Blog
Pew Research Center
Pew Research Center
Genomics Law Report
Genomics Law Report
Science 2.0
Science 2.0
The Guardian Headquarters
The Guardian Headquarters
Genetic Literacy Project
Genetic Literacy Project
Disclaimer

Statements posted on this blog represent the views of individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Center for Law Science & Innovation (which does not take positions on policy issues) or of the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law or Arizona State University.

No Silver Lining For HeIQ Materials AG

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has ordered the EPA to reevaluate its decision to conditionally register two nanosilver textile products.  The plaintiffs in NRDC v. EPA disagreed with the EPA’s approval and finding that the materials in question are not a risk concern and, therefore, do not require mitigation in conjunction with the EPA’s own mitigation rule.  Given the court’s ruling that the registrations are invalid,  the EPA may end up evaluating ways to mitigate oral and dermal exposure to these specific nanosilver products as part of its risk assessment prior to re-approval.  However, it is not certain yet exactly how the EPA will respond to the court’s decision.   The textile industry is attracted to nanosilver because it possesses effective antimicrobial properties.  Nonetheless, nanomaterials have very special characteristics resulting in expressions that are distinct from those exhibited by their much larger counterparts, leading to health and safety concerns.  Read the story here.