Visit our website
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
MIT Technology Review
MIT Technology Review
io9
io9
Techdirt
Techdirt
Knowledge@Wharton
Knowledge@Wharton
Bioscience Technology
Bioscience Technology
redOrbit
redOrbit
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Popular Science Blog
Popular Science Blog
Pew Research Center
Pew Research Center
Genomics Law Report
Genomics Law Report
Science 2.0
Science 2.0
The Guardian Headquarters
The Guardian Headquarters
Genetic Literacy Project
Genetic Literacy Project
Disclaimer

Statements posted on this blog represent the views of individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Center for Law Science & Innovation (which does not take positions on policy issues) or of the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law or Arizona State University.

23andMeandtheFDA

With the FDA’s warning letter to 23andMe and follow-up articles taking news networks by storm, ASU law professor, Gary Marchant weighed in on the issue in an article for Slate entitled The FDA Could Set Personal Genetics Rights Back DecadesIn his commentary,  Marchant claims that the FDA’s directive to 23andMe to cease marketing its genetic tests “is a shortsighted, heavy-handed, double-standard act of paternalism,”  further challenging that its warning letter is part of the FDA’s concerted effort to eradicate the right of consumers to gain access to their own genetic information within the direct-to-consumer scheme.  Marchant argues that people should have a right to access their own data through service providers such as 23andMe and that FDA’s archaic and ill-suited regulatory system as applied to home genetic testing has effectively put a significant part of that data out of consumers’ reach – for the foreseeable future.