Visit our website
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
MIT Technology Review
MIT Technology Review
io9
io9
Techdirt
Techdirt
Knowledge@Wharton
Knowledge@Wharton
Bioscience Technology
Bioscience Technology
redOrbit
redOrbit
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Popular Science Blog
Popular Science Blog
Pew Research Center
Pew Research Center
Genomics Law Report
Genomics Law Report
Science 2.0
Science 2.0
The Guardian Headquarters
The Guardian Headquarters
Genetic Literacy Project
Genetic Literacy Project
Disclaimer

Statements posted on this blog represent the views of individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Center for Law Science & Innovation (which does not take positions on policy issues) or of the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law or Arizona State University.

Tuesday Triple Trivia Tease for May 20, 2014

3 Questions. 3 Hints. 3 Answers. Every Tuesday.

1. What recently reported spurious correlation emphasizes the importance of logical theory?

Hint:

Answer: though there is a correlation between U.S. spending on science and suicides by hanging (and suffocation & strangulation) it is a spurious correlation.   There are many other examples of illusory correlations that have surfaced over the years, a couple of which are brought to light here.  The moral of the story is that before you accept a connection, make sure it is backed up by more than just numbers on a graph.

2. What seems to be increasingly and annoyingly buzzing around that, unlike a mosquito, can’t be slapped (in the traditional sense)?

Hint:

Answer: camera, video and audio equipped drones appear to be everywhere these days.  Creepy stories abound including this one involving a female sunbather.  While drones may be used for recreational purposes, their use has raised many concerns including privacy violations and personal & environmental injuries.

3. What recent court decision drastically cut into one woman’s Facebook time? “Like” if you agree with the holding.

Hint:

Answer: a New Jersey appellate panel has spoken: a mother’s free speech rights were not violated by an earlier decision restricting her ability to post disturbing material about her ex-husband and children on Facebook.  Read the details here.