Hats off to writer & blogger Hank Campbell and his science forum Science 2.0 where he recently challenged a review in the British Journal of Nutrition that found the “nutritional quality and safety of organic food was higher than conventional foods.” Campbell provides highly compelling reasons why we should not take the Journal review too seriously. A favorite passage, referring to one of the authors of the review, Charles Benbrook, is “[d]id this economist reinvent toxicology? Do toxic organic pesticides dissolve into rainbows when they are placed on a delivery truck? How can there so many fewer residues on organic food when it is known organic growers simply use different pesticides, not fewer?” Another, once again referring to Benbrook, “he is an economist, not a biologist. Nothing wrong with economists talking about science, but if environmentalists and Mother Jones don’t let economists overturn climate studies, why would they endorse it in biology? That’s a mystery.” Read Campbell’s insightful review here.