Visit our website
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
MIT Technology Review
MIT Technology Review
io9
io9
Techdirt
Techdirt
Knowledge@Wharton
Knowledge@Wharton
Bioscience Technology
Bioscience Technology
redOrbit
redOrbit
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Popular Science Blog
Popular Science Blog
Pew Research Center
Pew Research Center
Genomics Law Report
Genomics Law Report
Science 2.0
Science 2.0
The Guardian Headquarters
The Guardian Headquarters
Genetic Literacy Project
Genetic Literacy Project
Disclaimer

Statements posted on this blog represent the views of individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Center for Law Science & Innovation (which does not take positions on policy issues) or of the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law or Arizona State University.

Wednesday Web Watch for October 29, 2014

Law lag.  We hear about it all the time, as we continually move to resolve cutting-edge issues involving avant-garde technologies.  The oft-discussed concern is whether we can effectively use laws applied to early 21st Century technologies to regulate novel, emerging systems.   Are they horses of the same color?  “No” says Ryan Calo,”[t]oday software can touch you, which may force courts and regulators to strike a new balance.”  Nonetheless, Calo does concede there are parallels with, and lessons learned from, ancestor technologies which he discusses in his article entitled, A Horse of a Different Color, published by Slate.