Visit our website
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
MIT Technology Review
MIT Technology Review
io9
io9
Techdirt
Techdirt
Knowledge@Wharton
Knowledge@Wharton
Bioscience Technology
Bioscience Technology
redOrbit
redOrbit
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Popular Science Blog
Popular Science Blog
Pew Research Center
Pew Research Center
Genomics Law Report
Genomics Law Report
Science 2.0
Science 2.0
The Guardian Headquarters
The Guardian Headquarters
Genetic Literacy Project
Genetic Literacy Project
Disclaimer

Statements posted on this blog represent the views of individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Center for Law Science & Innovation (which does not take positions on policy issues) or of the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law or Arizona State University.

Worldwide Web Watch

WWW

October 7, 2015

Adina Roskies recently joined The Conversation on pharma and techno brain interventions.  Who we “are” is primarily associated not with our bodies but with our mind and brain, as the executor of what our bodies do or don’t do.  In her article Roskies asks, what happens to “us” when our brain states are altered?  Is deep brain stimulation that different from technology enabling our bodies to function better?  Should brain interventions excuse resulting behaviors?  All questions to ponder as we advance with R&D in this thoughtful area.