Visit our website
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
MIT Technology Review
MIT Technology Review
io9
io9
Techdirt
Techdirt
Knowledge@Wharton
Knowledge@Wharton
Bioscience Technology
Bioscience Technology
redOrbit
redOrbit
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Popular Science Blog
Popular Science Blog
Pew Research Center
Pew Research Center
Genomics Law Report
Genomics Law Report
Science 2.0
Science 2.0
The Guardian Headquarters
The Guardian Headquarters
Genetic Literacy Project
Genetic Literacy Project
Disclaimer

Statements posted on this blog represent the views of individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Center for Law Science & Innovation (which does not take positions on policy issues) or of the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law or Arizona State University.

Worldwide Web Watch

WWWMay 11, 2016

A fight to preserve and enforce contractual terms has turned into a battle for the recognition of personhood for frozen embryos involved in “custody” disputes.  A potential law, being considered by the state of Missouri, would require judges to render decisions consistent with the best interests of the in vitro human embryo.  Writing for BuzzFeed, Azeen Ghorayshi examines Jasha McQueen’s legal fight for custody of her and her ex-husband’s frozen embryos, per the terms of their fertility clinic consent form.   ASU law professor and Center faculty director, Gary Marchant, is quoted in Ghorayshi’s article on the issue of consent forms and highlights that state courts are currently all over the map as to whether judges will enforce the terms of the contract or find ways to disregard the express terms of an agreement, resulting in inconsistent outcomes. Read the BuzzFeed article here.