Visit our website
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
MIT Technology Review
MIT Technology Review
io9
io9
Techdirt
Techdirt
Knowledge@Wharton
Knowledge@Wharton
Bioscience Technology
Bioscience Technology
redOrbit
redOrbit
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Popular Science Blog
Popular Science Blog
Pew Research Center
Pew Research Center
Genomics Law Report
Genomics Law Report
Science 2.0
Science 2.0
The Guardian Headquarters
The Guardian Headquarters
Genetic Literacy Project
Genetic Literacy Project
Disclaimer

Statements posted on this blog represent the views of individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Center for Law Science & Innovation (which does not take positions on policy issues) or of the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law or Arizona State University.

Marchant Talks New Tech Challenges with California Judges

Center Faculty Director Gary Marchant recently spoke to the California Judges Association Annual Conference in San Francisco. Marchant’s talk, New Technology Intersects with the Old and New Law, addressed the challenges for judges presented by new technologies and scientific evidence.

Today, courts must handle new types of technical, digital, genetic, and neuroscientific evidence. Even though most judges do not have scientific training, and usually do not have clerks or assistants with such expertise, they are increasingly being called upon to be on the front lines of dealing with new technologies. Judges must not only make decisions about admissibility under the Daubert or similar standards, but they must also consider fairness, prejudice, privacy, and authenticity issues often connected with these new kinds of evidence.

Where legislatures and regulatory agencies cannot move fast enough to govern these rapidly emerging technologies, courts must often take the lead in handling pressing issues.