Visit our website
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
MIT Technology Review
MIT Technology Review
io9
io9
Techdirt
Techdirt
Knowledge@Wharton
Knowledge@Wharton
Bioscience Technology
Bioscience Technology
redOrbit
redOrbit
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Popular Science Blog
Popular Science Blog
Pew Research Center
Pew Research Center
Genomics Law Report
Genomics Law Report
Science 2.0
Science 2.0
The Guardian Headquarters
The Guardian Headquarters
Genetic Literacy Project
Genetic Literacy Project
Disclaimer

Statements posted on this blog represent the views of individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Center for Law Science & Innovation (which does not take positions on policy issues) or of the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law or Arizona State University.

November 2017 Coffee Challenge

During the semester we feature a technology with potential legal, social and/or ethicalĀ  implications and ask: What’s your answer?

One $25 gift card to City Central Coffee, located on the 6th floor of the Beus Center for Law and Society, will be awarded based on the thorough and thoughtful comments below. Put your answer in the comments. Deadline to be eligible for this month’s gift card is December 1, 2017.
Sophia, Hanson Robotics Ltd. speaking at the AI for GOOD Global Summit, ITU, Geneva, Switzerland

The government of Saudi Arabia recently granted citizenship to a robot named Sophia. While this decision has been ridiculed as little more than a publicity stunt, it does raise broader questions about whether and when robots or artificial intelligence (AI) should ever be entitled to rights of any kind.

Do you think AI should or will ever be given rights? How do you see such a step occurring? What do you think will be the most profound, interesting, or disturbing implications of recognizing rights in machines?