Visit our website
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
MIT Technology Review
MIT Technology Review
io9
io9
Techdirt
Techdirt
Knowledge@Wharton
Knowledge@Wharton
Bioscience Technology
Bioscience Technology
redOrbit
redOrbit
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Popular Science Blog
Popular Science Blog
Pew Research Center
Pew Research Center
Genomics Law Report
Genomics Law Report
Science 2.0
Science 2.0
The Guardian Headquarters
The Guardian Headquarters
Genetic Literacy Project
Genetic Literacy Project
Disclaimer

Statements posted on this blog represent the views of individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Center for Law Science & Innovation (which does not take positions on policy issues) or of the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law or Arizona State University.

Not a “Cyber Pearl Harbor” . . . yet

The New York Times website was hacked yesterday, apparently the work of a group calling itself the Syrian Electronic Army, which supports Syrian President Assad. The news site remained unavailable for hours, even while U.S. officials openly discussed possible strikes against Syria in retaliation for a recent chemical attack. While not catastrophic, the disruption was a grim reminder that conflicts are no longer confined to physical battlefields and that cyber weapons have unlimited range.

Also yesterday, outgoing Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano warned in her farewell address that a cataclysmic cyber attack on the U.S. is only a matter of time: “Our country will . . . at some point, face a major cyber event that will have a serious effect on our lives, our economy, and the everyday functioning of our society.” (emphasis added).  So perhaps we can expect more frequent tremors like the NYT website shutdown before The Big One eventually hits.