Visit our website
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
MIT Technology Review
MIT Technology Review
io9
io9
Techdirt
Techdirt
Knowledge@Wharton
Knowledge@Wharton
Bioscience Technology
Bioscience Technology
redOrbit
redOrbit
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Popular Science Blog
Popular Science Blog
Pew Research Center
Pew Research Center
Genomics Law Report
Genomics Law Report
Science 2.0
Science 2.0
The Guardian Headquarters
The Guardian Headquarters
Genetic Literacy Project
Genetic Literacy Project
Disclaimer

Statements posted on this blog represent the views of individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Center for Law Science & Innovation (which does not take positions on policy issues) or of the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law or Arizona State University.

Infant DNA Sequencing: Worth It?

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is launching a five-year, 25M project to determine whether DNA sequencing in newborns should replace the current “heel stick” blood test.  The heel stick test screens for up to 31 health conditions out of a possible 8,000 or so.  The NIH genomic study will involve approximately 2000 infants from five separate hospitals across the country, including two in Boston. The program will focus on a benefits versus harms analysis intended to address a variety of issues from ethical concerns stemming from the disclosure of a child’s genetic information to healthcare procedures such as determining which infants will benefit most from DNA testing and what specific genetic conditions should be emphasized.   Some of the issues the NIH study will likely face have been raised in the past (see here) by our Center Faculty Fellow and Director, Gary Marchant and Rachel Lindor (MD/JD, Class of 2011), a former Center Research Director.