Visit our website
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
MIT Technology Review
MIT Technology Review
io9
io9
Techdirt
Techdirt
Knowledge@Wharton
Knowledge@Wharton
Bioscience Technology
Bioscience Technology
redOrbit
redOrbit
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Popular Science Blog
Popular Science Blog
Pew Research Center
Pew Research Center
Genomics Law Report
Genomics Law Report
Science 2.0
Science 2.0
The Guardian Headquarters
The Guardian Headquarters
Genetic Literacy Project
Genetic Literacy Project
Disclaimer

Statements posted on this blog represent the views of individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Center for Law Science & Innovation (which does not take positions on policy issues) or of the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law or Arizona State University.

CSPO Occasional Seminar – 2:30pm, Thursday, November 6, 2014

Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes

Presents:

Genomics in the Market University

Thursday, November 6th, 2014 | 2:30 pm

Arizona State University

Tempe Campus

Payne Hall — Room 129

Featuring:

Robert Cook-Deegan,

Research Professor, Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University.

Genomics grew out of the Human Genome Project, emerging as a field just as US policy changed explicitly to cultivate university research as a source of economic growth. Genomics was both science and biotechnology from birth. Patent policy became an important undercurrent, and flared into controversy repeatedly, most conspicuously as Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics was decided by the Supreme Court. Policies on public support of biomedical research, patents, regulation of new medical technologies, coverage and reimbursement of medical goods and services were and are–unsurprisingly–incoherent. Genomics is but a microcosm of biomedical research policy in general, and the role of academic health centers in particular. Learn about this story through the lens of our research center, which was sucked into the maelstrom of gene patent controversies, plus some short digressions into the role of an academic policy research center confronting policy change in real time, and the role of students in conducting that research.​