Visit our website
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
MIT Technology Review
MIT Technology Review
io9
io9
Techdirt
Techdirt
Knowledge@Wharton
Knowledge@Wharton
Bioscience Technology
Bioscience Technology
redOrbit
redOrbit
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Popular Science Blog
Popular Science Blog
Pew Research Center
Pew Research Center
Genomics Law Report
Genomics Law Report
Science 2.0
Science 2.0
The Guardian Headquarters
The Guardian Headquarters
Genetic Literacy Project
Genetic Literacy Project
Disclaimer

Statements posted on this blog represent the views of individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Center for Law Science & Innovation (which does not take positions on policy issues) or of the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law or Arizona State University.

Worldwide Web Watch

Blog background2March 16, 2016

Setting the record straight to relieve concerns about DIY laboratories using CRISPR technology, a group of folks familiar with the inner-workings of such labs, provide their opinions, compiled by Patrick Skerrett for STAT news.  The contributors point out that there are codes of conduct in place, that the materials used are pretty benign, there is transparency and that, frankly, doomsday scenarios could happen at any lab.  However, they also note that while there are interesting and useful projects arising from DIY labs, care must, nonetheless, be taken.  Yet safety is a concern at any lab, they say, with most requiring improvement and follow-through with regard to implemented protocols.  At the end of the day, the message here seems to be that DIY labs are no worse, and are arguably less worrisome, than more regulated or seemingly controlled entities.