Visit our website
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
MIT Technology Review
MIT Technology Review
io9
io9
Techdirt
Techdirt
Knowledge@Wharton
Knowledge@Wharton
Bioscience Technology
Bioscience Technology
redOrbit
redOrbit
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Popular Science Blog
Popular Science Blog
Pew Research Center
Pew Research Center
Genomics Law Report
Genomics Law Report
Science 2.0
Science 2.0
The Guardian Headquarters
The Guardian Headquarters
Genetic Literacy Project
Genetic Literacy Project
Disclaimer

Statements posted on this blog represent the views of individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Center for Law Science & Innovation (which does not take positions on policy issues) or of the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law or Arizona State University.

Worldwide Web Watch

WWWearthMay 4, 2016

As is often the case, what was once considered good, is now considered bad and vice versa.  Coffee is but one example (now good!).  Vitamin D, in the form of a supplement, is another (now bad!).  The same goes for what was once considered effective and now is deemed ineffective.  Take the “love hormone” oxytocin.  Scientists believed for quite some time that oxytocin could melt away reserved and distant feelings and replace them with love and closeness.  After all, oxytocin, a known natural (and synthetic) labor inducer is said to help promote bonding between a new mother and her child.  Now those same scientists doubt that oxytocin can do what it was once believed to be capable of extent-wise.  Brian Resnick in How scientists fell in and out of love with the hormone oxytocin explains why.