Visit our website
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
MIT Technology Review
MIT Technology Review
io9
io9
Techdirt
Techdirt
Knowledge@Wharton
Knowledge@Wharton
Bioscience Technology
Bioscience Technology
redOrbit
redOrbit
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Popular Science Blog
Popular Science Blog
Pew Research Center
Pew Research Center
Genomics Law Report
Genomics Law Report
Science 2.0
Science 2.0
The Guardian Headquarters
The Guardian Headquarters
Genetic Literacy Project
Genetic Literacy Project
Disclaimer

Statements posted on this blog represent the views of individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Center for Law Science & Innovation (which does not take positions on policy issues) or of the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law or Arizona State University.

Worldwide Web Watch

Worldwide Web WatchJune 1, 2016

“We are organisms not computers.  Get over it” says Robert Epstein.  In his article, The Empty Brain, Epstein highlights that comparing the human brain to a computer is a fallacy.  We don’t come into this world with, and never develop, the many attributes a computer is born with, such as programs, algorithms, rules and so forth.  The issue, claims Epstein, is that brain-IP comparisons have become sticky – just like certain expressions (e.g. “robust”).  Epstein uses an example, involving a dollar bill, to demonstrate the human brain’s lack of representational capacity.  He makes other points challenging the “IP metaphor” and concludes that because the brain is not a computer we need not be concerned or hopeful about concepts such as achieving immortality via brain uploading — in other words, the singularity is not near.