Visit our website
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
MIT Technology Review
MIT Technology Review
io9
io9
Techdirt
Techdirt
Knowledge@Wharton
Knowledge@Wharton
Bioscience Technology
Bioscience Technology
redOrbit
redOrbit
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Popular Science Blog
Popular Science Blog
Pew Research Center
Pew Research Center
Genomics Law Report
Genomics Law Report
Science 2.0
Science 2.0
The Guardian Headquarters
The Guardian Headquarters
Genetic Literacy Project
Genetic Literacy Project
Disclaimer

Statements posted on this blog represent the views of individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Center for Law Science & Innovation (which does not take positions on policy issues) or of the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law or Arizona State University.

Worldwide Web Watch

WWW

August 10, 2016

Gene doping, if it’s happening or if it’s going to happen, are hot topics during the Rio Olympics.  News reports surfaced this past week about WADA’s intent to conduct doping testing via a blood test developed to detect copies of the “EPO gene” — which increases red blood cell counts, leading to superior athletic performance.  But there are other genes besides EPO that could boost performance and ways to administer enhancements not detectable by a blood test.   Even current tests used to detect conventional doping are not sophisticated enough to catch all cases. Michael Le Page discusses gene doping in his article Gene doping in sport could make the Olympics fairer and saferLe Page argues that there is no way to effectively stop doping and that the ban should be lifted as a result.  He considers and counters oft-raised moral objections and provides solutions for better integration of a new playing field.