Visit our website
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
MIT Technology Review
MIT Technology Review
io9
io9
Techdirt
Techdirt
Knowledge@Wharton
Knowledge@Wharton
Bioscience Technology
Bioscience Technology
redOrbit
redOrbit
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Popular Science Blog
Popular Science Blog
Pew Research Center
Pew Research Center
Genomics Law Report
Genomics Law Report
Science 2.0
Science 2.0
The Guardian Headquarters
The Guardian Headquarters
Genetic Literacy Project
Genetic Literacy Project
Disclaimer

Statements posted on this blog represent the views of individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Center for Law Science & Innovation (which does not take positions on policy issues) or of the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law or Arizona State University.

Faculty Fellow Michael Saks’ Recent Talks on Forensic Science

Regent Professor and Center Faculty Fellow Michael Saks recently presented on forensic science at two prestigious events.

On October 18, Saks spoke before an association of forensic scientists from Arizona, Utah, and Nevada at the Arizona Identification Council‘s 12th Annual Tri-Division Educational Conference. His talk, Building Forensic Science’s Scientific Foundation, explained what recent government– and discipline-sponsored reports found to be weaknesses in forensic science, what can be done, and the unusual barriers that have slowed progress in the field.

On October 27-28, Saks spoke at a symposium on Experts, Inference, and Innocence hosted by the Seton Hall Law Review at Seton Hall University of Law. In his talk, The Disregarded Necessity: Validity Testing of Forensic Feature-Comparison Techniques, Saks described what he believes are the three possible strategies for trying to validate the forensic identification sciences, which he termed the black-box model, the DNA model, and the basic-research model.