Visit our website
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
MIT Technology Review
MIT Technology Review
io9
io9
Techdirt
Techdirt
Knowledge@Wharton
Knowledge@Wharton
Bioscience Technology
Bioscience Technology
redOrbit
redOrbit
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Popular Science Blog
Popular Science Blog
Pew Research Center
Pew Research Center
Genomics Law Report
Genomics Law Report
Science 2.0
Science 2.0
The Guardian Headquarters
The Guardian Headquarters
Genetic Literacy Project
Genetic Literacy Project
Disclaimer

Statements posted on this blog represent the views of individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Center for Law Science & Innovation (which does not take positions on policy issues) or of the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law or Arizona State University.

Prof. Aaron Fellmeth on Solar Trade Dispute

Faculty Fellow and Professor Aaron Fellmeth was recently interviewed about a trade dispute in the solar technology industry. Solar companies have requested new trade barriers on imported solar technology in a safeguard investigation before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC).

Two U.S.-based solar panel manufactures argue that cheap imported solar technology is hurting their businesses. They have requested steep tariffs on all such foreign solar equipment.

The ITC has found that cheap imports have harmed domestic companies, but the final choice of remedy will be up to President Trump. If tariffs are imposed, according to Professor Fellmeth, consumers will pay more for solar and the move may not benefit the domestic solar technology industry in the long run.

There is no example in history of an industry that has prospered in the long run thanks to a safeguard measures.

Read more about this issue and hear the interview with Professor Fellmeth here: In Solar Trade Dispute, Will Proposed Tariffs Cost Industry Jobs?