Visit our website
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
MIT Technology Review
MIT Technology Review
io9
io9
Techdirt
Techdirt
Knowledge@Wharton
Knowledge@Wharton
Bioscience Technology
Bioscience Technology
redOrbit
redOrbit
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Popular Science Blog
Popular Science Blog
Pew Research Center
Pew Research Center
Genomics Law Report
Genomics Law Report
Science 2.0
Science 2.0
The Guardian Headquarters
The Guardian Headquarters
Genetic Literacy Project
Genetic Literacy Project
Disclaimer

Statements posted on this blog represent the views of individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Center for Law Science & Innovation (which does not take positions on policy issues) or of the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law or Arizona State University.

The Different Types of Innovation in the Practice of Law

Professor William D. Henderson, Indiana University Maurer School of Law, is one of the leading voices on innovation in the legal profession. He recently wrote on how innovation works in the practice of law at the cutting edge.

Henderson, drawing on what he calls the McKenna Lifecycle of a Practice Area, identifies two types of innovation practiced by lawyers: 1) building substantial knowledge on the law and technical details impacting an emerging technology or practice area; and 2) improvements on the delivery of legal services in that area. These different types of innovation can be mapped out across the emergence, growth, maturation, and ultimate saturation of a new practice area.

Knowing how and when to invest in innovation can be critical to a successful law practice. Henderson’s discussion of the different types of innovation in the practice of law is definitely worth your time. Additionally, Henderson highlights Faculty Director Gary Marchant as an example of someone highly skilled at practicing the first type of innovation.

He [wows] legal audiences with novel questions of law that judges, regulators, and practicing lawyers are grappling with as a result of massive advances in science and technology, from autonomous cars to drones to cloning to global warming to digital data that captures our every move and hence of great value in determining issues of guilt or civil liability. . . . Gary Marchant is an astonishing example of how to get the three circles of teaching, service and scholarship to overlap in near perfect unity.

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email