Visit our website
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
New America Cypbersecurity Initiative
MIT Technology Review
MIT Technology Review
io9
io9
Techdirt
Techdirt
Knowledge@Wharton
Knowledge@Wharton
Bioscience Technology
Bioscience Technology
redOrbit
redOrbit
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Popular Science Blog
Popular Science Blog
Pew Research Center
Pew Research Center
Genomics Law Report
Genomics Law Report
Science 2.0
Science 2.0
The Guardian Headquarters
The Guardian Headquarters
Genetic Literacy Project
Genetic Literacy Project
Disclaimer

Statements posted on this blog represent the views of individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Center for Law Science & Innovation (which does not take positions on policy issues) or of the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law or Arizona State University.

LSI Highlight: “Sex-Based Brain Differences and Emotional Harm” by Betsy Grey

Center for Law, Science and Innovation Faculty Fellow Betsy Grey, published “Sex-Based Brain Differences and Emotional Harm” last year studying the sex-based differences in the brain. Technological advances have allowed neuroscientists to identify those differences, potentially leading to explanations for sex-biased population differences in behavior and brain-based disorders. The research is still in the early stages, but creates the perfect opportunity to examine the potential legal implications of these findings. Grey’s article examines the questions in the context of tort law, especially how scientific findings may affect the use of the reasonable person standard in emotional injury claims. These studies suggest that there may be distinct sex-based mechanisms involved in reactions to extreme stress, raising the question of whether women experience and process stress and trauma differently than men.  The article argues that these studies may eventually inform the use of the reasonableness standard for freestanding emotional harm claims. With the development of science, courts may either apply a reasonable woman standard in limited contexts or at least allow jurors to consider evidence of sex-based differences in applying a reasonable person standard. By recognizing these differences, courts have already begun to apply the reasonable woman standard to hostile workplace environment claims and science may support border use of that standard, especially when considering negligent and intentional infliction of emotional harm claims. 
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on email
Share on facebook